(Forum Home)--->(System Info & Announcements)--->(WE WIN!!!)
| Thread Admin: AuctionArmsCeo (6-0-0) (Last 10 Posts) | Posted: 06/26/2008 at 17:53:31 |
| Total Posts: 55 |
Thread Title: "WE WIN!!!"
|
| Thread Admin: AuctionArmsCeo (6-0-0) (Last 10 Posts) | Posted: 06/26/2008 at 17:53:31 |
| Total Posts: 55 |
Thread Title: "WE WIN!!!"
|
| Seller: AA-bob(3-0-0) | Post#31 - Posted: 07/08/2008 at 17:06:41 |
|
bugmantrap, that portion of the opinion your point out is not "the holding" in this case. It is window dressing and is commonly refered to in legalese as "dicta" or more correctly, "Obiter dicta" ... those [words] which are not binding, but are merely editorializing, or explanatory in nature. |
| Thread Admin: AuctionArmsCeo(6-0-0) | Post#32 - Posted: 07/09/2008 at 21:25:35 |
|
This is basic, folks. Prior to this ruling, no court in the land would take seriously the merits of argueing a person's 2nd Amendment rights were violated. In many ways, without this ruling, the antis had already won and we kept anything resembling 2nd Amendment rights because of the popularity of guns - and not because of anything the courts were doing to help us. This changes that. Now, a lawyer can march into a courtroom, and regardless of a judge's personal predilictions, that judge will have to respect the high court's explicit statement that the 2nd Amendment protects an individual right - and at least give that lawyer's arguments some thought.
This is a win. Our win. Soak it up! |
| Former Seller: ELDORADO 1(224-0-0) | Post#33 - Posted: 07/10/2008 at 11:54:11 |
| (no avatar) | Manny......You are 100% correct my friend. So have you got the suit filed against the Kalifornia Department of Justice yet? Let's get this boat rocking and keep it going! |
| Former Seller: Hagrid(23-0-0) | Post#34 - Posted: 07/10/2008 at 18:42:38 |
|
Well gentlemen, we have at least proved one point. We have completed 34 post to this thread and I have not read a single name called nor personal attack brought forth.We have disagreed and agreed while being civil about it. I will agree to give this some more thought from your side of the arguement.AA-Bob make a point with me with his last two posts. It is a side I had not considered.So I, as I am sure all of you, will have to develope a wait and see attitude as to where the antis attack and how they attack next. good thread. Trapper |
| Former Seller: Sportsmanssupply(3387-0-3) | Post#35 - Posted: 07/11/2008 at 10:50:34 |
| (no avatar) | AABob's law degree can come in handy sometimes. |
| Former Seller: Hagrid(23-0-0) | Post#36 - Posted: 07/11/2008 at 16:32:40 |
|
|
Grant, especialy when dealing with a hardhead like me LOL Trapper |
| Former Seller: OLD RATTLER(180-0-0) | Post#37 - Posted: 07/11/2008 at 20:06:33 |
| (no avatar) | WHEN YOU ARE SWIMMING UPSTREAM , NEVER LET YOUR GUARD DOWN . FOOD FOR THOUGHT !!! |
| Former Seller: Joes Custom Guns(352-2-2) | Post#38 - Posted: 07/13/2008 at 06:42:08 |
| (no avatar) | Do you have the right to have a gun in your home for protection,IF someone in the home is a covicted felon That quistion is being asked in a court in Pittsbutg |
| Former Seller: Hagrid(23-0-0) | Post#39 - Posted: 07/13/2008 at 12:17:16 |
|
|
Tighten your cinch strap cyro, this is just the start. I will say no more. trapper |
| Former Seller: Gun nut Bob(63-0-0) | Post#40 - Posted: 07/21/2008 at 14:34:46 |
| (no avatar) | Trapper, when you say no more Satan himself will be freezing his butt off wearing a fur coat and this forum would be no fun at all!!! |