Negative Feedback for crockette
If you would like to edit or delete feedback you've posted on crockette, or
if you are crockette, you must be
logged in. You can only edit
or delete feedback if you're the poster, and you have just three days after posting to do so.
|
| Seller: oldrancher (User Rating) | Rating: Negative | When: 07/07/2012 at 19:35:24 |
| Auction: 11073948 |
| Comments: Beware of this guy. Check his feedback. |
| Rebuttal left by: crockette | When: 07/17/2012 at 14:41:34 |
| Rebuttal: "oldrancher"'s gun would have been OK if packed well and UPS didn't break it. He had NOT INSURED IT THOUGH I PAID FOR INSURANCE.HE IS NOT AN FFL and didn't include photo ID. Said he would refund, but DID NOT. Will probably pocket the $100 automatic insurance. So who should get the NEGATIVE???????? |
| Seller: MOJAVE BILL (User Rating) | Rating: Negative | When: 12/01/2009 at 09:02:53 |
| Auction: 9430812 |
| Comments: AS MY ADD SAID IF THERE IS A PROBLUM WITH A ITEM WE WILL AJUST, OR YOU COULD SEND IT BACK BUT YOU DID NOT GIVE US A CHACE YOU HAVE BOUGHT 3 OF THEM FROM US BUT I GUESS YOU WOULD RATHER PUT BAD FEED BACK ON MY 100 % SALES RECORD. F.Y.I ALL BRNOS ARE FIRED AT THE FACTORY AND LEFT DIRTY. |
| Rebuttal left by: crockette | When: 12/16/2009 at 16:41:03 |
| Rebuttal: Interesting that MOJAVE BILL is so sensitive to a NEUTRAL comment on AUCTION 9430812- not NEW, as stated and no return - not exactly according to AA rules. It took 20 passes with a br----brush to clean. day.NEUTRAL is NEUTRAL- not bad; not great. Does he protest to much? |
| Seller: ralphe (User Rating) | Rating: Negative | When: 02/17/2008 at 07:57:15 |
| Auction: 8460070 |
| Comments: BAD BUYER ...LAST SECOND BIDDER WHO NEVER READ THE DESCRIPTION OR LOOKED AT THE PHOTOS ...WILL NEVER DEAL WITH HIM AGAIN .. |
| Rebuttal left by: crockette | When: 02/26/2008 at 14:59:43 |
| Rebuttal: Sorry Ralphe, you are right. The NEUTRAL comments that I posted for you were for another seller of a similar gun. I should have been more carefull with posting comments. |
| Buyer: Natman (User Rating) | Rating: Negative | When: 06/12/2002 at 14:57:14 |
| Auction: 2581151 |
| Comments: Seller misrepresents goods in previous auction. He offers credit on this auction. He changes offer AFTER I bid. I do NOT try to force him to give me ANYTHING. I try to negotiate, he refuses, rants about being cheated. He gives me untrue retaliatory negative feedback. |
| Poster: Natman (User Rating) | Rating: Negative | When: 04/15/2002 at 18:20:50 |
| Auction: 2326410 |
| Comments: Seller said gun was original with “Excellent” bore. Barrel was hacksawed shorter and bore was pitted. Due to Calif. gun laws, I was unable notify seller within 3 days. Seller is can weasel out of refund, but it doesn’t change the fact that he grossly misrepresented condition. |
| Rebuttal left by: crockette | When: 04/17/2002 at 18:43:14 |
| Rebuttal: Natman emailed me 5 WEEKS after shipment complaining about an item. Since over the 3 DAY inspection period I offered an item that he wanted in exchange. He wanted me to GIVE him the $205 alternative FREE and not return the original item. How would you react? "not just off the "turnip wagon" |
| Buyer: kroy (User Rating) | Rating: Negative | When: 01/08/2002 at 19:49:02 |
| Auction: 2068443 |
| Comments: Over 2" cut from the bbl recently, since end and vice marks shinny.It was done with a pipe cutter,which bulged the ext. and left an int. burr. Seller claimed no knowledge, would refund $ but not shi/fees. This is not a case of grade but pure fraud.I chose to avoid all contact and save. |
| Rebuttal left by: crockette | When: 01/09/2002 at 12:10:14 |
| Rebuttal: kroy was offered a "FULL" refund, including S&H. He decided that gun was still a good buy at 1/2 BlueBook |
| Buyer: bad shot (User Rating) | Rating: Negative | When: 12/26/2001 at 20:49:11 |
| Auction: 1974849 |
| Comments: |
| Rebuttal left by: crockette | When: 01/09/2002 at 12:03:51 |
| Rebuttal: BAD SHOT returned rifle as it was not to his taste. Within two weeks guerin bought it at the same price from the same auction description and loved it - see guerin positive comment. You can't please everyone. I gave him a neutral to get my selling fee back. |
| Poster: 2 shot wz (User Rating) | Rating: Negative | When: 03/17/2001 at 12:57:09 |
| Auction: 1100784 |
| Comments: The 1st shot a piece fell out from behind the receiver and a nise crack appeared from nowhere, he had an excellent rating with a scratch or two on the stock! Beware Buyers |
| Rebuttal left by: crockette | When: 03/28/2001 at 23:22:22 |
| Rebuttal: Contacted immediately and offered to repair. |
| Poster: Ham Bone (User Rating) | Rating: Negative | When: 03/21/2000 at 13:39:37 |
| Auction: 7514152110 |
| Comments: Seller advertised 200 rounds of "once-fired" brass. Technicaly true but EVERY case sent was badly tarnished, 100 were COMPLETELY corroded. NONE - not one - was reloadable as sold. Many are deeply and permanently pitted even after hand-cleaning each case with chemical brass cleaner and polishing with abrasive - HOURS of work and extra $$. Seller withheld actual condition knowing the truth would hold down the bidding. Deceptive practice - failure to disclose true condition in order to profit. He offered to replace but with NEW brass at FULL PRICE..! Said he would refund $ for bad cases but only if I pay postage BOTH WAYS. Trade at your own risk..! |
| Rebuttal left by: crockette | When: 03/21/2000 at 19:02:24 |
| Rebuttal: HAM BONE bought once-fired cases for $.18 each that cost $1.00 each new. When first informed of his dissatisfaction, I offered to replace the dirty cases. After two more emails from him and no returned cases, I offered to refund his money. Still haven't received cases. You be the judge. |
|
This user has received 9 Negative feedback
.
|